PatentMind: A Multi-Aspect Reasoning Graph for Patent Similarity Evaluation
Yongmin Yoo, Qiongkai Xu, Longbing Cao

TL;DR
PatentMind introduces a multi-aspect reasoning graph framework for patent similarity evaluation, effectively capturing technical, legal, and application dimensions to emulate expert judgment and outperform existing models.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel Multi-Aspect Reasoning Graph (MARG) framework that decomposes patents into multiple dimensions and dynamically weights similarity scores based on context, improving accuracy.
Findings
Strong correlation (r=0.938) with expert annotations
Outperforms embedding-based and patent-specific models
Provides a structured foundation for patent decision-making
Abstract
Patent similarity evaluation plays a critical role in intellectual property analysis. However, existing methods often overlook the intricate structure of patent documents, which integrate technical specifications, legal boundaries, and application contexts. We introduce PatentMind, a novel framework for patent similarity assessment based on a Multi-Aspect Reasoning Graph (MARG). PatentMind decomposes patents into their three dimensions of technical features, application domains, and claim scopes, then dimension-specific similarity scores are calculated over the MARG. These scores are dynamically weighted through a context-aware reasoning process, which integrates contextual signals to emulate expert-level judgment. To support evaluation, we construct a human-annotated benchmark PatentSimBench, comprising 500 patent pairs. Experimental results demonstrate that the PatentMind-generated…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
