Misleading through Inconsistency: A Benchmark for Political Inconsistencies Detection
Nursulu Sagimbayeva, Ruveyda Bet\"ul Bah\c{c}eci, Ingmar Weber

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new dataset and benchmark for detecting political inconsistencies in statements, demonstrating that large language models perform comparably to humans overall but still struggle with fine-grained inconsistency types.
Contribution
It provides a novel dataset of political statement pairs with annotations and explanations, and benchmarks LLMs on inconsistency detection in the political domain.
Findings
LLMs are as good as humans at overall inconsistency detection.
LLMs outperform individual humans in predicting crowd-annotated ground-truth.
Models struggle with fine-grained inconsistency types due to natural labeling variation.
Abstract
Inconsistent political statements represent a form of misinformation. They erode public trust and pose challenges to accountability, when left unnoticed. Detecting inconsistencies automatically could support journalists in asking clarification questions, thereby helping to keep politicians accountable. We propose the Inconsistency detection task and develop a scale of inconsistency types to prompt NLP-research in this direction. To provide a resource for detecting inconsistencies in a political domain, we present a dataset of 698 human-annotated pairs of political statements with explanations of the annotators' reasoning for 237 samples. The statements mainly come from voting assistant platforms such as Wahl-O-Mat in Germany and Smartvote in Switzerland, reflecting real-world political issues. We benchmark Large Language Models (LLMs) on our dataset and show that in general, they are as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMisinformation and Its Impacts
