The Parameterized Complexity of Computing the Linear Vertex Arboricity
Alexander Erhardt, Alexander Wolff

TL;DR
This paper explores the computational complexity of determining the linear vertex arboricity of graphs, revealing NP-hardness results for various maximum degree classes and establishing fixed-parameter tractability with respect to treewidth.
Contribution
It provides the first parameterized complexity analysis of linear vertex arboricity, showing para-NP-hardness for maximum degree and fixed-parameter tractability for treewidth.
Findings
NP-hard for graphs with maximum degree 5
NP-hard for planar graphs with maximum degree 6
FPT with respect to treewidth for any fixed k
Abstract
The \emph{linear vertex arboricity} of a graph is the smallest number of sets into which the vertices of a graph can be partitioned so that each of these sets induces a linear forest. Chaplick et al. [JoCG 2020] showed that, somewhat surprisingly, the linear vertex arboricity of a graph is the same as the \emph{3D weak line cover number} of the graph, that is, the minimum number of straight lines necessary to cover the vertices of a crossing-free straight-line drawing of the graph in . Chaplick et al. [JGAA 2023] showed that deciding whether a given graph has linear vertex arboricity 2 is NP-hard. In this paper, we investigate the parameterized complexity of computing the linear vertex arboricity. We show that the problem is para-NP-hard with respect to the parameter maximum degree. Our result is tight in the following sense. All graphs of maximum degree 4 (except for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Cellular Automata and Applications
