Usability of Token-based and Remote Electronic Signatures: A User Experience Study
Omer Ege, Mustafa Cagal, Kemal Bicakci

TL;DR
This study compares token-based and remote electronic signatures, revealing that remote signatures are more usable while token-based ones are perceived as more secure, highlighting usability-security trade-offs in digital signing.
Contribution
It provides an empirical user experience comparison of token-based and remote e-signatures, offering insights into usability and security perceptions.
Findings
Remote e-signatures are perceived as more usable due to minimal setup.
Token-based signatures are rated as more secure by users.
Preference trends favor remote signatures for convenience.
Abstract
As electronic signatures (e-signatures) become increasingly integral to secure digital transactions, understanding their usability and security perception from an end-user perspective has become crucial. This study empirically evaluates and compares two major e-signature systems -- token-based and remote signatures -- through a controlled user experience study with 20 participants. Participants completed tasks involving acquisition, installation, and document signing using both methods, followed by structured surveys and qualitative feedback. Statistical analyses revealed that remote e-signatures were perceived as significantly more usable than token-based ones, due to their minimal setup and platform-independent accessibility. In contrast, token-based signatures were rated as significantly more secure, highlighting users' trust in hardware-based protection. Although more participants…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
