Spiking Neural Networks Need High Frequency Information
Yuetong Fang, Deming Zhou, Ziqing Wang, Hongwei Ren, ZeCui Zeng, Lusong Li, Shibo Zhou, Renjing Xu

TL;DR
This paper identifies a frequency bias in spiking neural networks that suppresses high-frequency information, and proposes Max-Former to enhance high-frequency signals, significantly improving performance on various benchmarks.
Contribution
It reveals the inherent low-pass filtering bias in SNNs and introduces Max-Former, a novel architecture that restores high-frequency information for better accuracy.
Findings
Max-Former achieves 82.39% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet.
Replacing Avg-Pooling with Max-Pool improves CIFAR-100 accuracy.
Max-ResNet-18 sets new state-of-the-art on CIFAR datasets.
Abstract
Spiking Neural Networks promise brain-inspired and energy-efficient computation by transmitting information through binary (0/1) spikes. Yet, their performance still lags behind that of artificial neural networks, often assumed to result from information loss caused by sparse and binary activations. In this work, we challenge this long-standing assumption and reveal a previously overlooked frequency bias: spiking neurons inherently suppress high-frequency components and preferentially propagate low-frequency information. This frequency-domain imbalance, we argue, is the root cause of degraded feature representation in SNNs. Empirically, on Spiking Transformers, adopting Avg-Pooling (low-pass) for token mixing lowers performance to 76.73% on Cifar-100, whereas replacing it with Max-Pool (high-pass) pushes the top-1 accuracy to 79.12%. Accordingly, we introduce Max-Former that restores…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
MethodsConvolution
