Debate-to-Detect: Reformulating Misinformation Detection as a Real-World Debate with Large Language Models
Chen Han, Wenzhen Zheng, Xijin Tang

TL;DR
This paper presents Debate-to-Detect, a multi-agent debate framework utilizing large language models to improve misinformation detection through structured adversarial discussions and multi-dimensional evaluation, enhancing interpretability and accuracy.
Contribution
Introduces a novel debate-based framework with multi-dimensional assessment for misinformation detection, inspired by fact-checking workflows, leveraging GPT-4o for improved performance.
Findings
Significant performance improvements over baseline methods.
Enhanced interpretability through iterative evidence refinement.
Effective multi-dimensional evaluation across five claim aspects.
Abstract
The proliferation of misinformation in digital platforms reveals the limitations of traditional detection methods, which mostly rely on static classification and fail to capture the intricate process of real-world fact-checking. Despite advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) that enhance automated reasoning, their application to misinformation detection remains hindered by issues of logical inconsistency and superficial verification. In response, we introduce Debate-to-Detect (D2D), a novel Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) framework that reformulates misinformation detection as a structured adversarial debate. Inspired by fact-checking workflows, D2D assigns domain-specific profiles to each agent and orchestrates a five-stage debate process, including Opening Statement, Rebuttal, Free Debate, Closing Statement, and Judgment. To transcend traditional binary classification, D2D introduces a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsMisinformation and Its Impacts
