Semantic Correspondence: Unified Benchmarking and a Strong Baseline
Kaiyan Zhang, Xinghui Li, Jingyi Lu, Kai Han

TL;DR
This paper provides the first comprehensive survey and analysis of semantic correspondence methods in computer vision, introduces a unified benchmark, and proposes a strong baseline that achieves state-of-the-art results.
Contribution
It offers a taxonomy of existing methods, a unified benchmark with comparative results, and a simple baseline that sets new performance standards.
Findings
Unified benchmarking enables fair comparison of methods.
The proposed baseline achieves state-of-the-art performance.
Component analysis reveals key factors influencing accuracy.
Abstract
Establishing semantic correspondence is a challenging task in computer vision, aiming to match keypoints with the same semantic information across different images. Benefiting from the rapid development of deep learning, remarkable progress has been made over the past decade. However, a comprehensive review and analysis of this task remains absent. In this paper, we present the first extensive survey of semantic correspondence methods. We first propose a taxonomy to classify existing methods based on the type of their method designs. These methods are then categorized accordingly, and we provide a detailed analysis of each approach. Furthermore, we aggregate and summarize the results of methods in literature across various benchmarks into a unified comparative table, with detailed configurations to highlight performance variations. Additionally, to provide a detailed understanding on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
