Directed Semi-Simplicial Learning with Applications to Brain Activity Decoding
Manuel Lecha, Andrea Cavallo, Francesca Dominici, Ran Levi, Alessio Del Bue, Elvin Isufi, Pietro Morerio, Claudio Battiloro

TL;DR
This paper introduces Semi-Simplicial Neural Networks (SSNs), a novel topological deep learning model that captures directed higher-order relationships, significantly improving brain activity decoding and outperforming existing models in accuracy.
Contribution
The paper presents SSNs, a new class of TDL models operating on semi-simplicial sets to encode directed higher-order motifs, with a scalable routing extension and proven greater expressiveness.
Findings
SSNs outperform state-of-the-art models in brain activity classification by up to 27%.
Routing-SSNs improve relation selection, enhancing scalability.
SSNs show competitive results on standard node and edge tasks.
Abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) excel at learning from pairwise interactions but often overlook multi-way and hierarchical relationships. Topological Deep Learning (TDL) addresses this limitation by leveraging combinatorial topological spaces. However, existing TDL models are restricted to undirected settings and fail to capture the higher-order directed patterns prevalent in many complex systems, e.g., brain networks, where such interactions are both abundant and functionally significant. To fill this gap, we introduce Semi-Simplicial Neural Networks (SSNs), a principled class of TDL models that operate on semi-simplicial sets -- combinatorial structures that encode directed higher-order motifs and their directional relationships. To enhance scalability, we propose Routing-SSNs, which dynamically select the most informative relations in a learnable manner. We prove that SSNs are strictly…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
- The paper is well written and easy to follow. - The paper provides strong theoretical results on WL-expressivity, permutation equivariance, and invariant recovery, establishing clear theoretical advantages over prior models. - The integration with brain dynamics modeling via Dynamical Activity Complexes (DACs) connects deep learning with neurotopology in a rigorous, data-driven way, replacing handcrafted invariants. - SSN is able to achieve large accuracy gains (up to 50% over GNNs) on ch
- Recent literature has shown that transformers can be considered message passing neural networks [1]. However, results using multi-head attention over node features are missing. Since SSNs generalize message passing to relation-aware updates, such attention-based comparisons would clarify whether the proposed relational framework yields benefits beyond architectural scaling, or the transformer model is able to learn relations. - The ablation on relation classes (e.g., face-map–induced vs. inte
- The paper gives clean algebraic definitions, distinguishes orientation vs directionality, and proves that SSNs strictly contain the expressive power of GNNs/Dir-GNNs/MPSNNs while being able to recover key invariants. - Using semi-simplicial sets allows the model to treat different vertex orderings as distinct simplices, preserving directionality information that is lost in traditional TDL architectures. - The experiments span three application domains: brain dynamics, traffic flow regressio
1. Although the paper presents DACs as a novel construct, similar formulations of dynamic higher-order connectivity already exist in prior work such as [1]. The paper should clarify what is genuinely new. 2. The semi-simplicial formalism is conceptually close to combinatorial complexes [2] and several Combinatorial-Complex Neural Networks (CCNNs) already exist [3], [4]. The paper lacks a conceptual and empirical comparison, leaving ambiguity as to whether SSNs represent a subset, superset, or m
- The paper has a well-motivated focus on directionality and multi-way interactions, important for brain data. - General framework that subsumes GNNs, directed GNNs, and simplicial networks. - Theoretical results on WL-expressivity and recovery of neuro-topological invariants. - Strong empirical gains on brain-dynamics classification. Overall, I find the paper to be strong. It introduces a novel framework that is well-grounded in theory, effectively subsuming several pioneering baselines. The e
- There is no comparison with other topological or higher-order message-passing baselines (e.g., [1, 2, 3]), if they are applicable on these tasks. If these methods are indeed not relevant or comparable in this context, it would be helpful for the authors to clarify why that is the case. - Minor weakness: the paper lacks an ablation study showing which types of relations contribute most to performance or how sensitive results are to the choice of relations. **References:** [1] Cin++: Enhancing
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications · Machine Learning and Algorithms · Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory
