TL;DR
This paper introduces a promptable cancer segmentation method that achieves high accuracy with minimal expert-annotated data, reducing labeling costs and variability, and outperforming existing promptable models.
Contribution
The authors propose a novel promptable segmentation approach that requires only 24 fully-segmented and 8 weakly-labelled images, significantly reducing data annotation needs.
Findings
Outperforms existing promptable segmentation methods.
Performs comparably to fully-supervised methods with much less data.
Requires up to 100X less annotated data.
Abstract
Automated segmentation of cancer on medical images can aid targeted diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. However, its adoption is limited by the high cost of expert annotations required for training and inter-observer variability in datasets. While weakly-supervised methods mitigate some challenges, using binary histology labels for training as opposed to requiring full segmentation, they require large paired datasets of histology and images, which are difficult to curate. Similarly, promptable segmentation aims to allow segmentation with no re-training for new tasks at inference, however, existing models perform poorly on pathological regions, again necessitating large datasets for training. In this work we propose a novel approach for promptable segmentation requiring only 24 fully-segmented images, supplemented by 8 weakly-labelled images, for training. Curating this minimal data…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
