TL;DR
This paper derives a theoretical lower bound on the performance of Active Noise Cancellation algorithms, combining information-theoretic and physical constraints, and validates it empirically across diverse acoustic conditions.
Contribution
It introduces a unified lower bound on ANC performance that integrates information theory and physical limitations, providing a benchmark for evaluating algorithms.
Findings
The bound accurately predicts the best achievable NMSE in various conditions.
Empirical validation shows the bound's tightness across different reverberation times.
Theoretical insights help understand fundamental limits of ANC performance.
Abstract
Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) algorithms aim to suppress unwanted acoustic disturbances by generating anti-noise signals that destructively interfere with the original noise in real time. Although recent deep learning-based ANC algorithms have set new performance benchmarks, there remains a shortage of theoretical limits to rigorously assess their improvements. To address this, we derive a unified lower bound on cancellation performance composed of two components. The first component is information-theoretic: it links residual error power to the fraction of disturbance entropy captured by the anti-noise signal, thereby quantifying limits imposed by information-processing capacity. The second component is support-based: it measures the irreducible error arising in frequency bands that the cancellation path cannot address, reflecting fundamental physical constraints. By taking the…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
The paper focuses on an information-theoretic perspective to ANC and prrovides a clean intuitive separation between algorithmic (information) and physical (spectral) performance limits. The paper primarily, could help researchers reason about 'how close' learned ANC systems operate to theoretical limits, serving as a conceptual benchmark. Finally, the paper evaluates multiple datasets, reverberation conditions, and baseline models to demonstrate empirical consistency of the bound.
While the paper’s conceptual framing is interesting, its theoretical and methodological depth remains limited. The main derivations rely heavily on established principles from information theory and signal processing, notably the Shannon rate-distortion lower bound and classical spectral support arguments derived from Parseval’s theorem. The proposed 'unified' bound is constructed heuristically by taking the maximum of these two well-known limits, without formal justification or proof that this
This is a well-written paper with good clarity. As a reader, I enjoy reading the paper. The theoretical bounds derived are verified in simulations and they capture the trend of the measured NMSE.
The information-theoretical bound is not surprising given that we know the mutual information and differential entropy rate of the disturbance process. For the support-based bound, it is trivial that the lack of frequency component modeling establishes a lower bound for NMSE. Therefore, the novelty of this paper seems weak.
(1) The paper’s emphasis on realistic, hardware-in-the-loop evaluation is timely and significant. Most prior studies have focused on simulation-based analysis, which often overlooks key practical factors such as transducer response, delay, and spatial sound propagation. By integrating real-world noise environments into the testing framework, the authors make an important step toward closing the gap between theoretical ANC models and deployable systems. (2) The proposed metric suite is another v
(1) The statement that existing ANC research lacks real-world evaluation or unified metrics is somewhat overstated. There is a substantial body of work, particularly from the audio engineering and acoustic signal processing communities, that includes hardware-based testing and adherence to industry standards for headphone or ear-cup ANC evaluation. The contribution of this work would be better framed as extending these established practices into a machine learning–oriented benchmarking context r
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
