Source Separation of Small Classical Ensembles: Challenges and Opportunities

TL;DR

This paper explores the challenges of musical source separation in classical ensembles, comparing causal and non-causal deep learning approaches, and introduces a new synthesized dataset to improve separation performance.

Contribution

It presents a new synthesized woodwind ensemble database and evaluates ConvTasNet models for classical music source separation, highlighting the importance of data realism.

Findings

Causal and non-causal approaches perform similarly on small real datasets.

Significant mismatch exists between synthesized and real recordings affecting separation quality.

Future work should focus on collecting more real data or enhancing synthesis realism.

Abstract

Musical (MSS) source separation of western popular music using non-causal deep learning can be very effective. In contrast, MSS for classical music is an unsolved problem. Classical ensembles are harder to separate than popular music because of issues such as the inherent greater variation in the music; the sparsity of recordings with ground truth for supervised training; and greater ambiguity between instruments. The Cadenza project has been exploring MSS for classical music. This is being done so music can be remixed to improve listening experiences for people with hearing loss. To enable the work, a new database of synthesized woodwind ensembles was created to overcome instrumental imbalances in the EnsembleSet. For the MSS, a set of ConvTasNet models was used with each model being trained to extract a string or woodwind instrument. ConvTasNet was chosen because it enabled both causal and non-causal approaches to be tested. Non-causal approaches have dominated MSS work and are useful for recorded music, but for live music or processing on hearing aids, causal signal processing is needed. The MSS performance was evaluated on the two small datasets (Bach10 and URMP) of real instrument recordings where the ground-truth is available. The performances of the causal and non-causal systems were similar. Comparing the average Signal-to-Distortion (SDR) of the synthesized validation set (6.2 dB causal; 6.9 non-causal), to the real recorded evaluation set (0.3 dB causal, 0.4 dB non-causal), shows that mismatch between synthesized and recorded data is a problem. Future work needs to either gather more real recordings that can be used for training, or to improve the realism and diversity of the synthesized recordings to reduce the mismatch...