A Framework for Spontaneous Brillouin Noise: Unveiling Fundamental Limits in Brillouin Metrology
Simeng Jin, Shuai Yao, Zhisheng Yang, Zixuan Du, Xiaobin Hong, Marcelo A. Soto, Jingjing Xie, Long Zhang, Fan Yang, Jian Wu

TL;DR
This paper develops and experimentally validates a comprehensive framework revealing spontaneous Brillouin scattering noise as a fundamental limit in Brillouin metrology, surpassing traditional noise sources and impacting various sensing and imaging technologies.
Contribution
It introduces the first analytical model predicting spontaneous Brillouin scattering noise as a universal fundamental limit in Brillouin systems, supported by experimental validation.
Findings
SpBS noise can dominate over shot noise in Brillouin metrology.
Experimental demonstration of SpBS-noise-limited regime in imaging and sensing.
Framework provides a basis for optimizing Brillouin technology performance.
Abstract
Spontaneous Brillouin scattering (SpBS) provides a non-contact tool for probing the mechanical and thermodynamic properties of materials, enabling important applications such as distributed optical fiber sensing and high-resolution Brillouin microscopy. Achieving metrological precision in these systems relies critically on identifying fundamental noise sources. While a pioneering study three decades ago numerically investigated an intrinsic SpBS noise mechanism, this phenomenon has remained largely unexplored, particularly in the context of Brillouin metrological systems. Here, by revisiting its physical formation process and rethinking its stochastic behaviors, we develop and experimentally validate a comprehensive analytical framework on this long-overlooked noise source. Importantly, we theoretically predict, for the first time, the SpBS noise is a universal and fundamental limit…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
