Transparency and Proportionality in Post-Processing Algorithmic Bias Correction
Juliett Su\'arez Ferreira, Marija Slavkovik, Jorge Casillas

TL;DR
This paper introduces measures to evaluate the fairness and transparency of post-processing bias correction methods in algorithmic decision-making, aiming to improve fairness assessments and guide better bias mitigation strategies.
Contribution
It develops new metrics for quantifying the proportionality and transparency of post-processing fairness interventions, enhancing understanding of their impacts.
Findings
Metrics effectively assess fairness and transparency in post-processing bias correction
Applying these measures reveals insights beyond traditional fairness metrics
The methodology supports more informed bias mitigation decisions
Abstract
Algorithmic decision-making systems sometimes produce errors or skewed predictions toward a particular group, leading to unfair results. Debiasing practices, applied at different stages of the development of such systems, occasionally introduce new forms of unfairness or exacerbate existing inequalities. We focus on post-processing techniques that modify algorithmic predictions to achieve fairness in classification tasks, examining the unintended consequences of these interventions. To address this challenge, we develop a set of measures that quantify the disparity in the flips applied to the solution in the post-processing stage. The proposed measures will help practitioners: (1) assess the proportionality of the debiasing strategy used, (2) have transparency to explain the effects of the strategy in each group, and (3) based on those results, analyze the possibility of the use of some…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
