PawPrint: Whose Footprints Are These? Identifying Animal Individuals by Their Footprints
Inpyo Song, Hyemin Hwang, Jangwon Lee

TL;DR
This paper introduces PawPrint and PawPrint+ datasets for identifying individual animals by their footprints, evaluating deep learning and classical methods to improve non-invasive pet identification and conservation.
Contribution
It provides the first public datasets for footprint-based animal identification and benchmarks various methods, highlighting their strengths and limitations.
Findings
Deep neural networks outperform classical features on complex substrates.
Combining global and local features improves identification reliability.
Footprint-based identification offers a non-invasive alternative to traditional methods.
Abstract
In the United States, as of 2023, pet ownership has reached 66% of households and continues to rise annually. This trend underscores the critical need for effective pet identification and monitoring methods, particularly as nearly 10 million cats and dogs are reported stolen or lost each year. However, traditional methods for finding lost animals like GPS tags or ID photos have limitations-they can be removed, face signal issues, and depend on someone finding and reporting the pet. To address these limitations, we introduce PawPrint and PawPrint+, the first publicly available datasets focused on individual-level footprint identification for dogs and cats. Through comprehensive benchmarking of both modern deep neural networks (e.g., CNN, Transformers) and classical local features, we observe varying advantages and drawbacks depending on substrate complexity and data availability. These…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsGreedy Policy Search
