The Quasi-Polynomial Low-Degree Conjecture is False
Rares-Darius Buhai, Jun-Ting Hsieh, Aayush Jain, Pravesh K. Kothari

TL;DR
This paper disproves the low-degree conjecture by constructing examples where low-degree advantage vanishes but efficient algorithms still distinguish distributions, challenging assumptions in average-case complexity.
Contribution
It provides counterexamples to the low-degree conjecture, showing that vanishing low-degree advantage does not imply computational hardness.
Findings
Constructed permutation-invariant distributions with vanishing low-degree advantage
Demonstrated efficient algorithms for noisy distinguishing despite low-degree advantage
Used list-decoding algorithms for high-error polynomial interpolation
Abstract
There is a growing body of work on proving hardness results for average-case estimation problems by bounding the low-degree advantage (LDA) - a quantitative estimate of the closeness of low-degree moments - between a null distribution and a related planted distribution. Such hardness results are now ubiquitous not only for foundational average-case problems but also central questions in statistics and cryptography. This line of work is supported by the low-degree conjecture of Hopkins, which postulates that a vanishing degree- LDA implies the absence of any noise-tolerant distinguishing algorithm with runtime whenever 1) the null distribution is product on , and 2) the planted distribution is permutation invariant, that is, invariant under any relabeling . In this paper, we disprove this conjecture. Specifically,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
