Development and Validation of Engagement and Rapport Scales for Evaluating User Experience in Multimodal Dialogue Systems
Fuma Kurata, Mao Saeki, Masaki Eguchi, Shungo Suzuki, Hiroaki Takatsu, Yoichi Matsuyama

TL;DR
This paper develops and validates engagement and rapport scales to evaluate user experience in multimodal dialogue systems, demonstrating their effectiveness in distinguishing between human and agent interactions in language learning.
Contribution
It introduces new scales based on interdisciplinary theories and validates their reliability and validity in assessing user experience in dialogue systems.
Findings
Scales reliably measure engagement and rapport.
Scales differentiate between human and agent dialogue experiences.
Validated through statistical analyses.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate two scales of engagement and rapport to evaluate the user experience quality with multimodal dialogue systems in the context of foreign language learning. The scales were designed based on theories of engagement in educational psychology, social psychology, and second language acquisition.Seventy-four Japanese learners of English completed roleplay and discussion tasks with trained human tutors and a dialog agent. After each dialogic task was completed, they responded to the scales of engagement and rapport. The validity and reliability of the scales were investigated through two analyses. We first conducted analysis of Cronbach's alpha coefficient and a series of confirmatory factor analyses to test the structural validity of the scales and the reliability of our designed items. We then compared the scores of engagement and rapport between the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
