Truth and Trust: Fake News Detection via Biosignals
Gennie Nguyen, Lei Wang, Yangxueqing Jiang, Tom Gedeon

TL;DR
This study investigates the use of physiological signals, specifically EDA and PPG, to detect the truthfulness of information and its interaction with user belief, highlighting the potential and challenges of physiological-based fake news detection.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach using biosignals for classifying truth and belief interactions, providing benchmark results and emphasizing the need for multimodal detection methods.
Findings
EDA outperforms PPG in truth detection
Performance drops in joint belief-veracity classification
Physiological signals reflect basic truth perception
Abstract
Understanding how individuals physiologically respond to false information is crucial for advancing misinformation detection systems. This study explores the potential of using physiological signals, specifically electrodermal activity (EDA) and photoplethysmography (PPG), to classify both the veracity of information and its interaction with user belief. In a controlled laboratory experiment, we collected EDA and PPG signals while participants evaluated the truthfulness of climate-related claims. Each trial was labeled based on the objective truth of the claim and the participant's belief, enabling two classification tasks: binary veracity detection and a novel four-class joint belief-veracity classification. We extracted handcrafted features from the raw signals and trained several machine learning models to benchmark the dataset. Our results show that EDA outperforms PPG, indicating…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMisinformation and Its Impacts · Spam and Phishing Detection
