TL;DR
This paper uncovers a significant privacy risk in fine-tuning open-source LLMs, where creators can extract proprietary data from models with black-box access, demonstrating high success rates and discussing defenses.
Contribution
It reveals a novel backdoor attack that enables extraction of proprietary fine-tuning data from open-source LLMs, highlighting a critical privacy vulnerability.
Findings
Up to 76.3% of fine-tuning data can be extracted in practical settings.
Success rate of data extraction can reach 94.9% in ideal conditions.
Detection-based defenses can be bypassed with improved attacks.
Abstract
Fine-tuning on open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) with proprietary data is now a standard practice for downstream developers to obtain task-specific LLMs. Surprisingly, we reveal a new and concerning risk along with the practice: the creator of the open-source LLMs can later extract the private downstream fine-tuning data through simple backdoor training, only requiring black-box access to the fine-tuned downstream model. Our comprehensive experiments, across 4 popularly used open-source models with 3B to 32B parameters and 2 downstream datasets, suggest that the extraction performance can be strikingly high: in practical settings, as much as 76.3% downstream fine-tuning data (queries) out of a total 5,000 samples can be perfectly extracted, and the success rate can increase to 94.9% in more ideal settings. We also explore a detection-based defense strategy but find it can be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
