Non-individuality and experience
Raoni Arroyo

TL;DR
This paper explores the philosophical interpretation of quantum mechanics, addressing the gap between non-individuals and experience, and discusses various interpretations and their implications for understanding quantum phenomena.
Contribution
It analyzes the non-individuals interpretation of quantum mechanics, connecting it to standard theory and proposing two viable approaches for its development.
Findings
Identifies the gap between non-individuals and experience in quantum mechanics
Analyzes the measurement problem in relation to the non-individuals interpretation
Proposes two pathways for non-individuals interpretation: Bohmian and Modal-Hamiltonian
Abstract
This chapter acknowledges a gap between the ``non-individuals'' interpretation of quantum mechanics and our world of experience, and begins to bridge it. Section 1 states the problem with Abner Shimony's ``Phenomenological principle''; section 2 briefly presents the interpretation with connection to standard quantum mechanics; section 3 presents the measurement problem in connection with the Phenomenological principle, the standard way out of it, and why the ``non-individuals'' interpretation of quantum mechanics should not follow it; section 4 finally shows two closed venues for such an interpretation (Bohmian mechanics and the Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation), and two alternatives for such it (Everettian quantum mechanics and spontaneous collapse theories).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Relativity and Gravitational Theory
