A two-stage model for factors influencing citation counts
Pablo Dorta-Gonz\'alez, Emilio G\'omez-D\'eniz

TL;DR
This paper introduces a two-stage hurdle negative binomial regression model to analyze factors influencing citation counts of research papers, accounting for excess zeros and overdispersion in the data.
Contribution
It develops and applies a novel two-stage model combining hurdle and negative binomial regression to better understand citation dynamics.
Findings
Collaboration and funding increase citation counts and reduce zero citations.
Higher journal impact factors correlate with more citations.
Open access via repositories boosts citations and reduces zero citations.
Abstract
This work aims to study a count response random variable, the number of citations of a research paper, affected by some explanatory variables through a suitable regression model. Due to the fact that the count variable exhibits substantial variation since the sample variance is larger than the sample mean, the classical Poisson regression model seems not to be appropriate. We concentrate attention on the negative binomial regression model, which allows the variance of each measurement to be a function of its predicted value. Nevertheless, the process of citations of papers may be divided into two parts. In the first stage, the paper has no citations, and the second part provides the intensity of the citations. A hurdle model for separating the documents with citations and those without citations is considered. The dataset for the empirical application consisted of 43,190 research papers…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsscientometrics and bibliometrics research · Advanced Text Analysis Techniques · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
