Comparison of simulations and semi-analytical model for WDM subhalo mass functions
Mizuki Ono, Takashi Okamoto, Shin'ichiro Ando, and Tomoaki Ishiyama

TL;DR
This study compares high-resolution simulations and a semi-analytical model to predict WDM subhalo mass functions, validating the model's effectiveness and identifying areas for refinement in modeling tidal effects and removing spurious subhalos.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the SASHIMI-W semi-analytical model accurately reproduces simulation results for WDM subhalo mass functions across various redshifts and particle masses.
Findings
SASHIMI-W successfully matches simulation results from z=0 to z=2.
Both models show a slight redshift dependence in subhalo suppression.
Discrepancies in low-mass regions suggest need for improved tidal and spurious subhalo modeling.
Abstract
The Cold Dark Matter (CDM) model successfully explains large-scale structure formation, but challenges remain at smaller scales, leading to interest in Warm Dark Matter (WDM) as an alternative. The abundance of Milky Way subhalos depends on the mass of WDM particles, allowing constraints to be obtained by comparing observations and theoretical models. However, high-resolution simulations of heavier WDM particle masses are computationally demanding, making semi-analytical approaches valuable. In this study, we evaluate the ability of the Semi-Analytical Sub-Halo Inference Modeling for WDM (SASHIMI-W) to reproduce subhalo mass functions for heavier WDM particle masses. We perform high-resolution cosmological N-body simulations for CDM and WDM with particle masses of 1 keV, 3 keV, and 10 keV, and compare the ratio of the subhalo mass function between WDM and CDM cases. Our results show…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
