The Limits of Graph Samplers for Training Inductive Recommender Systems: Extended results
Theis E. Jendal, Matteo Lissandrini, Peter Dolog, Katja Hose

TL;DR
This paper investigates the effectiveness of graph sampling techniques in training inductive recommender systems, revealing trade-offs between data reduction, training time, and recommendation performance, and emphasizing the importance of temporal data considerations.
Contribution
It provides an empirical evaluation of graph sampling methods for inductive recommender systems and highlights the need for new sampling techniques that incorporate temporal information.
Findings
Sampling with 50% of data maintains performance and reduces training time by up to 86%.
Reducing training data further degrades recommendation quality.
Temporal aspects are crucial for effective graph sampling in recommendation tasks.
Abstract
Inductive Recommender Systems are capable of recommending for new users and with new items thus avoiding the need to retrain after new data reaches the system. However, these methods are still trained on all the data available, requiring multiple days to train a single model, without counting hyperparameter tuning. In this work we focus on graph-based recommender systems, i.e., systems that model the data as a heterogeneous network. In other applications, graph sampling allows to study a subgraph and generalize the findings to the original graph. Thus, we investigate the applicability of sampling techniques for this task. We test on three real world datasets, with three state-of-the-art inductive methods, and using six different sampling methods. We find that its possible to maintain performance using only 50% of the training data with up to 86% percent decrease in training time;…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsFocus
