Generic full-vector angular spectrum method for calculating diffraction of arbitrary electromagnetic fields
Chengda Song, Jing He, Guanghui Yuan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a comprehensive full-vector angular spectrum method that accurately and efficiently models electromagnetic diffraction for arbitrary incident fields, including reflection and transmission effects, significantly speeding up optical system design.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel full-vector angular spectrum approach that improves accuracy and efficiency in electromagnetic diffraction calculations, addressing previous limitations in incident field modeling.
Findings
Achieves rapid computation times of a few seconds for symmetric systems.
Handles arbitrary incident fields with precise polarization projection.
Inherently models reflection and transmission at dielectric interfaces.
Abstract
Numerous vector angular spectrum methods have been presented to model the vectorial nature of diffractive electromagnetic field, facilitating optical field engineering in polarization-related and high numerical aperture systems. However, balancing accuracy and efficiency in state-of-the-art vector methods is challenging, especially with not well-defined incident fields. Here, we propose a full-vector angular spectrum method for accurate, efficient, robust diffraction computation, allowing truly arbitrary incidence by precisely modeling the projection rule among Cartesian polarization components. We address a prior oversight, that the longitudinal electric field's projection onto the diffracted field was insufficiently considered. Notably, our method inherently handles reflection and transmission at dielectric interfaces, which can be viewed as k-space filters. For rotationally symmetric…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
