An Alignment Between the CRA's Essential Requirements and the ATT&CK's Mitigations
Jukka Ruohonen, Eun-Young Kang, Qusai Ramadan

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the alignment between the EU's Cyber Resilience Act requirements and MITRE's ATT&CK mitigations, identifying key gaps and contributing to harmonizing legal and technical cybersecurity frameworks.
Contribution
It provides a systematic analysis of the alignment between the CRA and ATT&CK, highlighting specific gaps and fostering better integration of legal and technical cybersecurity measures.
Findings
Overall good alignment between CRA and ATT&CK
Identified gaps in data minimization, data erasure, and vulnerability coordination
Gaps in threat intelligence, training, communication channels, and residual risks
Abstract
The paper presents an alignment evaluation between the mitigations present in the MITRE's ATT&CK framework and the essential cyber security requirements of the recently introduced Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) in the European Union. In overall, the two align well with each other. With respect to the CRA, there are notable gaps only in terms of data minimization, data erasure, and vulnerability coordination. In terms of the ATT&CK framework, gaps are present only in terms of threat intelligence, training, out-of-band communication channels, and residual risks. The evaluation presented contributes to narrowing of a common disparity between law and technical frameworks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Information and Cyber Security · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
