TL;DR
This paper introduces a systematic method to generate graph XAI benchmarks using Weisfeiler-Leman coloring, enabling more rigorous and reproducible evaluation of explainability techniques for GNNs.
Contribution
The authors propose an automated approach to create graph XAI benchmarks from generic datasets, introducing the OpenGraphXAI suite and a codebase for generating extensive benchmarks.
Findings
The benchmark suite includes 15 datasets derived from real-world molecular data.
The method aligns motif discriminability with Weisfeiler-Leman expressiveness.
Use case demonstrates improved assessment of graph explainers.
Abstract
Graph neural networks have become the de facto model for learning from structured data. However, the decision-making process of GNNs remains opaque to the end user, which undermines their use in safety-critical applications. Several explainable AI techniques for graphs have been developed to address this major issue. Focusing on graph classification, these explainers identify subgraph motifs that explain predictions. Therefore, a robust benchmarking of graph explainers is required to ensure that the produced explanations are of high quality, i.e., aligned with the GNN's decision process. However, current graph-XAI benchmarks are limited to simplistic synthetic datasets or a few real-world tasks curated by domain experts, hindering rigorous and reproducible evaluation, and consequently stalling progress in the field. To overcome these limitations, we propose a method to automate the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
