Interactional Fairness in LLM Multi-Agent Systems: An Evaluation Framework
Ruta Binkyte

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new framework for evaluating interactional fairness in LLM multi-agent systems, adapting organizational psychology tools to measure fairness as a behavioral property in agent interactions.
Contribution
It extends fairness evaluation to non-sentient agents and provides an empirical validation framework using controlled simulations and established fairness measurement tools.
Findings
Tone and explanation quality influence acceptance decisions.
Interactional fairness impacts agent behavior.
Context affects the influence of fairness types.
Abstract
As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in multi-agent systems, questions of fairness should extend beyond resource distribution and procedural design to include the fairness of how agents communicate. Drawing from organizational psychology, we introduce a novel framework for evaluating Interactional fairness encompassing Interpersonal fairness (IF) and Informational fairness (InfF) in LLM-based multi-agent systems (LLM-MAS). We extend the theoretical grounding of Interactional Fairness to non-sentient agents, reframing fairness as a socially interpretable signal rather than a subjective experience. We then adapt established tools from organizational justice research, including Colquitt's Organizational Justice Scale and the Critical Incident Technique, to measure fairness as a behavioral property of agent interaction. We validate our framework through a pilot study using…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Embodied and Extended Cognition
