ChartEdit: How Far Are MLLMs From Automating Chart Analysis? Evaluating MLLMs' Capability via Chart Editing
Xuanle Zhao, Xuexin Liu, Haoyue Yang, Xianzhen Luo, Fanhu Zeng, Jianling Li, Qi Shi, Chi Chen

TL;DR
This paper introduces ChartEdit, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating multimodal large language models' ability to perform accurate chart editing, revealing current models' limitations in instruction following and precise modifications.
Contribution
The work presents a new benchmark, ChartEdit, with extensive annotations and evaluations of 10 MLLMs on chart editing tasks, highlighting the gap between model capabilities and desired performance.
Findings
Large models can generate code that partially matches reference images.
Current models struggle with accurate instruction following and precise edits.
Small-scale models also face challenges in chart editing tasks.
Abstract
Although multimodal large language models (MLLMs) show promise in generating chart rendering code, editing charts via code presents a greater challenge. This task demands MLLMs to integrate chart understanding and reasoning capacities, which are labor-intensive. While many MLLMs claim such editing capabilities, current evaluations rely on limited case studies, highlighting the urgent need for a comprehensive evaluation framework. In this work, we propose \textsc{ChartEdit}, a novel benchmark designed for chart editing tasks, featuring diverse editing instructions applied to real-world charts, each manually annotated and validated for accuracy. Utilizing \textsc{ChartEdit}, we evaluate the performance of 10 mainstream MLLMs across two types of experiments at both the code and chart levels. The results suggest that large-scale models can generate code to produce images that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsHandwritten Text Recognition Techniques · Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing · Digital Humanities and Scholarship
