Towards Universal Semantics With Large Language Models
Raymond Baartmans, Matthew Raffel, Rahul Vikram, Aiden Deringer, Lizhong Chen

TL;DR
This paper explores using large language models to generate Natural Semantic Metalanguage explications, aiming to establish a universal semantic framework applicable across languages and NLP tasks.
Contribution
It introduces the first automated approach using LLMs for NSM explication, including datasets, evaluation methods, and fine-tuned models surpassing GPT-4o.
Findings
Fine-tuned models outperform GPT-4o in accuracy
Automated methods enable scalable NSM explication
Potential applications in semantic analysis and translation
Abstract
The Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) is a linguistic theory based on a universal set of semantic primes: simple, primitive word-meanings that have been shown to exist in most, if not all, languages of the world. According to this framework, any word, regardless of complexity, can be paraphrased using these primes, revealing a clear and universally translatable meaning. These paraphrases, known as explications, can offer valuable applications for many natural language processing (NLP) tasks, but producing them has traditionally been a slow, manual process. In this work, we present the first study of using large language models (LLMs) to generate NSM explications. We introduce automatic evaluation methods, a tailored dataset for training and evaluation, and fine-tuned models for this task. Our 1B and 8B models outperform GPT-4o in producing accurate, cross-translatable explications,…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
- This paper addresses an interesting yet underexplored research topic NSM explications, which is relevant to multiple fields including machine translation and instruction following. - The cross-translatability experiment provides appropriate validation for the effectiveness of fine-tuning. - The methodologies for the dataset collection and cross-translatability test are well-explained, and the dataset will be a valuable resource for the research community.
- A limited number of models are applied into the experiments (small size Llama, Gemini-2.0-Flash and GPT-4o), therefore I'm a bit concerned whether the conclusions can be generalized. - In the substitutability test, the authors use three numbers: $\triangle_{base}$, $\triangle_{min}$, $\triangle_{ent}$. All these three are fragile to me (see questions). - Some of the prompts and examples are in the appendix but not mentioned in main text, which caused difficulty understanding the paragraphs.
The motivation behind the work - more generalizable methods to low resource languages - is something that the field should care about more.
My main issue with this work is that I have a difficulty convincing myself that the theoretical grounding that the work is built upon is sound and the approach of NSM primitive-based explication is actually a useful way to approach things. I confer that this may be partly due to my own background and priors, and would be open to discussions. Here are some thoughts in this regard: - Overall framing issues and lack of citations to work being criticized: I don't have a guess about what background o
This is an excellent and thoughtfully constructed paper. * Originality: The paper's originality is outstanding. It is, to my knowledge, the very first work to formally bridge the gap between modern LLMs and the well-established (in linguistics) NSM framework. This is a novel and exciting problem formulation. The authors don't just apply an LLM to a task; they propose a complete "stack" for a new sub-field: evaluation, data, and models. * Quality: The methodological quality is very high. The au
* **Validation of Proposed Metrics**: The entire paper's success hinges on the validity of the new automatic evaluation metrics (Legality and Substitutability). The authors briefly state that "Metrics Align with Qualitative Judgements" (Section 5), but this is presented as a summary (e.g., "DeepNSM models received top rankings 46% of the time"). This is insufficient. A formal, quantitative correlation analysis (e.g., Pearson or Spearman) between the "Explication Score" and blind human ratings is
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Topic Modeling · Machine Learning in Materials Science
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
