Efficient lattice QCD computation of radiative-leptonic-decay form factors at multiple positive and negative photon virtualities
Davide Giusti, Christopher F. Kane, Christoph Lehner, Stefan Meinel, Amarjit Soni

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates an efficient lattice QCD method to compute radiative-leptonic decay form factors across multiple photon virtualities, including both positive and negative values, with high precision and no additional computational cost.
Contribution
The study extends the 3d lattice QCD method to extract form factors at any photon virtuality from the same three-point functions, enhancing computational efficiency and scope.
Findings
Form factors computed for both positive and negative photon virtualities.
Analysis of different time orderings and quark flavor contributions.
Discussion on the behavior of unwanted exponentials and fit model choices.
Abstract
In previous work Phys. Rev. D 107, 074507 (2023), we showed that form factors for radiative leptonic decays of pseudoscalar mesons can be determined efficiently and with high precision from lattice QCD using the ``3d method,'' in which three-point functions are computed for all values of the current-insertion time and the time integral is performed at the data-analysis stage. Here, we demonstrate another benefit of the 3d method: the form factors can be extracted for any number of nonzero photon virtualites from the same three-point functions at no extra cost. We present results for the vector form factor as a function of photon energy and photon virtuality, for both positive and negative virtuality. In our analysis, we separately consider the two different time orderings and the different quark flavors in the electromagnetic current. We discuss in detail the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
