COSMO-INR: Complex Sinusoidal Modulation for Implicit Neural Representations
Pandula Thennakoon, Avishka Ranasinghe, Mario De Silva, Buwaneka Epakanda, Roshan Godaliyadda, Parakrama Ekanayake, Vijitha Herath

TL;DR
This paper introduces a complex sinusoidal modulation for activation functions in implicit neural representations, enhancing spectral support and improving performance across various vision tasks.
Contribution
It proposes a novel activation function modulated by complex sinusoidal terms, backed by harmonic analysis, leading to better spectral coverage and state-of-the-art results.
Findings
Significant PSNR improvements in image reconstruction
Enhanced robustness in denoising tasks
Superior super-resolution performance
Abstract
Implicit neural representations (INRs) are a powerful paradigm for modeling data, offering a continuous alternative to discrete signal representations. Their ability to compactly encode complex signals has led to strong performance in many vision tasks. Prior work shows INR performance is highly sensitive to the choice of activation function in the underlying multilayer perceptron, yet the theoretical reasons remain unclear. Key limitations also persist, including spectral bias (reduced sensitivity to high-frequency content), limited robustness to noise, and difficulty capturing local and global structure jointly. We analyze INR signal representation using harmonic analysis and Chebyshev polynomials. We prove that modulating activation functions with a complex sinusoidal term yields richer and more complete spectral support throughout the network. Building on this, we introduce a new…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
-- the paper presents a novel and Insightful Theoretical Analysis. The core strength is the mathematical analysis of activation functions using Chebyshev polynomials. This "spectral attenuation" is a novel and clearly articulated problem. -- good empirical results obtained in experiments. -- architecture is designed in a good engineering way, connecting the theory to a practical solution.
-- justification is weak when describing complex modulation. The network has a goal for real to real mapping, but the paper states that real part of the output is extracted in the final layer. not clear, paper fails to prove that the real part coefficients are alone sufficient and non-zero for all n. -- COSMO-RC is compared to INCODE but COSMO-RC already includes INCODE as embedder. -- pinpointing examples are not producing good results. similarly for 3D occupancy. Justification are missing.
1. Principled spectral analysis. The paper offers a clear, mathematically grounded explanation (via Chebyshev/harmonic analysis) of why purely even/odd activations suppress alternating frequency components, and motivates the proposed complex modulation as a targeted remedy. 2. Well-motivated stabilization of complex activations. The paper introduces pragmatic design choices—unit-circle normalization, real-part readout, and sigmoid-bounded parameterization of $(T,\zeta)$—that address numerical
1. No validation on inverse problems. INR research is expected to test inverse problems, not only forward fitting. There are no experiments on NeRF-style inverse rendering or PINN-style PDE inference. It is unclear if the activation helps optimization and identifiability in these settings. 2. Narrow harmonic analysis. The “harmonic distortion” study covers only raised-cosine, sine, Gaussian, and ReLU. It omits modern INR activations such as WIRE and FINER. Without these, the analysis may not ge
The paper has numerous strengths. I will list them in order of relevance: ## Strong Theoretical Foundation: The paper provides a rigorous spectral analysis of nonlinear activations in INRs, supported by harmonic decomposition and Chebyshev-based reasoning. The theoretical results justify the proposed activation design and its ability to achieve complete spectral support under composition. ## Well-Motivated Activation Design: The COSMO-RC activation is not heuristic; it is grounded in a princ
Just two weaknesses: ## Presentation of the Prior Knowledge Embedder: I understand that it is used as a black box from which COSMO-RC builds on, but readers not familiar with the concept may struggle to understand the proposed model architecture. A succinct intuitive description is sufficient to address this problem. Specifically, a description about how the latent code is generated and how it is mapped to the activation function parameters. ## Missing reference: * **Novello, Tiago, et al. "
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Neural Network Applications · Face Recognition and Perception · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
