Toward Adaptive Categories: Dimensional Governance for Agentic AI
Zeynep Engin, David Hand

TL;DR
This paper advocates for a dimensional governance framework for AI systems, enabling dynamic, context-aware decision-making and risk management as AI capabilities evolve beyond static categories.
Contribution
It introduces a dimensional approach to AI governance that tracks decision authority, process autonomy, and accountability, allowing adaptive and proactive risk management.
Findings
Dimensional governance enables preemptive adjustments before risks materialize.
It allows thresholds and classifications to evolve with AI capabilities.
The approach offers a resilient framework for future AI governance challenges.
Abstract
As AI systems evolve from static tools to dynamic agents, traditional categorical governance frameworks -- based on fixed risk tiers, levels of autonomy, or human oversight models -- are increasingly insufficient on their own. Systems built on foundation models, self-supervised learning, and multi-agent architectures increasingly blur the boundaries that categories were designed to police. In this Perspective, we make the case for dimensional governance: a framework that tracks how decision authority, process autonomy, and accountability (the 3As) distribute dynamically across human-AI relationships. A critical advantage of this approach is its ability to explicitly monitor system movement toward and across key governance thresholds, enabling preemptive adjustments before risks materialize. This dimensional approach provides the necessary foundation for more adaptive categorization,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
