TL;DR
This paper introduces a method to identify counterfactual evidence in node classification tasks using GNNs, aiming to improve fairness and interpretability by analyzing similar nodes with different classifications.
Contribution
It proposes novel algorithms and indexing techniques to efficiently find counterfactual node pairs, generalizing across different GNN models and enhancing interpretability.
Findings
Effective algorithms for counterfactual evidence search
Enhanced fairness and accuracy in GNNs
Generalization across various GNN architectures
Abstract
Counterfactual learning is emerging as an important paradigm, rooted in causality, which promises to alleviate common issues of graph neural networks (GNNs), such as fairness and interpretability. However, as in many real-world application domains where conducting randomized controlled trials is impractical, one has to rely on available observational (factual) data to detect counterfactuals. In this paper, we introduce and tackle the problem of searching for counterfactual evidences for the GNN-based node classification task. A counterfactual evidence is a pair of nodes such that, regardless they exhibit great similarity both in the features and in their neighborhood subgraph structures, they are classified differently by the GNN. We develop effective and efficient search algorithms and a novel indexing solution that leverages both node features and structural information to identify…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
