Age-stratified clustering of multiple long-term conditions

TL;DR

This study explores how long-term condition clusters vary across different age groups using a novel method, revealing significant age-specific differences and similarities in multimorbidity patterns from electronic health records.

Contribution

Introduces a method for identifying and comparing clusters of long-term conditions across age groups using Latent Class Analysis and Chebyshev distance, highlighting age-dependent multimorbidity patterns.

Findings

600 clusters identified across 12 age groups

Most clusters are age-specific with 263 unique to single age groups

Similar clusters with small variations are found in multiple age groups

Abstract

Background: Most people with any long-term condition have multiple long-term conditions, but our understanding of how conditions cluster is limited. Many clustering studies identify clusters in the whole population, but the clusters that occur in people of different ages may be distinct. The aim of this paper was to explore similarities and differences in clusters found in different age-groups. Method: We present a method for finding similar clusters in multiple age-groups, referred to as cluster sets, using Latent Class Analysis (LCA) and Chebyshev distance metric. We analyse a primary care electronic health record (EHR) dataset recording the presence of 40 long-term conditions (LTCs) in 570,355 people aged 40-99 years with at least one of these conditions, analysing in five-year age-groups. Findings: We find that the 600 clusters found separately in 12 age-strata can be summarised by 342 cluster sets with 263 cluster sets only being found in a single age-group (singleton cluster sets), and 79 cluster sets being present in multiple age-groups. We observe that 31 conditions of the 40 conditions studied appear in cluster sets with the respective condition being the only condition present with a very high prevalence of more than 0.9 whereas the remaining cluster sets typically contain two to four conditions present with a high prevalence of more than 0.7. Interpretation: Multimorbidity profiles in different age-groups are often distinct (singleton cluster sets observed only in that age-group), but similar clusters with small variations in their composition are also found in multiple age-groups. This demonstrates the age dependency of MLTC clusters and presents a case for age-stratified clustering.