Black hole thermodynamics probes the equivalence principle
Ana Alonso-Serrano, Luis J. Garay, Marek Li\v{s}ka

TL;DR
This paper introduces a criterion to detect violations of the equivalence principle in black hole thermodynamics, revealing that Lanczos-Lovelock gravity violates it while some nonlocal entropy expressions do not.
Contribution
It provides a simple theoretical test for equivalence principle violations in black hole thermodynamics and shows that Lanczos-Lovelock gravity does not satisfy this principle.
Findings
Lanczos-Lovelock gravity violates the strong equivalence principle
Certain nonlocal black hole entropy expressions obey the equivalence principle
General relativity remains compatible with the equivalence principle
Abstract
The equivalence principle for test gravitational physics strongly constrains dynamics of spacetime, providing a powerful criterion for selecting candidate theories of gravity. However, checking its validity for a particular theory is often a very difficult task. We devise here a simple theoretical criterion for identifying equivalence principle violations in black hole thermodynamics. Employing this criterion, we prove that Lanczos-Lovelock gravity violates the strong equivalence principle, leaving general relativity as the only local, diffeomorphism-invariant theory compatible with it. However, we also show that certain nonlocal expressions for black hole entropy appear to obey the strong equivalence principle.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
