Can a Referendum Solve Problems of Shared Sovereignty on Mars?
Roxanne Ruixian Zhu, Jacob Haqq-Misra

TL;DR
This paper explores the potential use of referendums for governance and decision-making in Martian settlements, drawing on terrestrial case studies to assess their effectiveness and limitations.
Contribution
It analyzes the applicability of terrestrial referendum practices to Martian governance and proposes conditions for their recognition as best practices for Mars settlements.
Findings
Referendums could help resolve governance issues on Mars.
They may reduce the risk of multiple conflicting authorities.
Other tools might be needed for larger Martian settlements.
Abstract
Space exploration technology continues to expand humanity's reach beyond Earth, and even more ambitious efforts are striving to establish long-duration human settlements on Mars. The dependence of martian settlers on life-support infrastructure and on resupply missions from the host nation could create conditions for tyranny or lead to other extreme and uncontrollable situations, but such risks could be reduced by thinking about the possibilities for effective decision making on Mars before any settlement efforts actually occur. This paper examines the extent to which referendums could be used on Mars as a means of political decision-making and sovereignty adjudication. Our approach draws on three terrestrial case studies -- the Great Idaho Movement in the United States, the Catalan Independence Movement in Spain, and the Quebec Independence Movement in Canada -- as potential analogs…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpace exploration and regulation · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
