The Evolving Landscape of Generative Large Language Models and Traditional Natural Language Processing in Medicine
Rui Yang, Huitao Li, Matthew Yu Heng Wong, Yuhe Ke, Xin Li, Kunyu Yu, Jingchi Liao, Jonathan Chong Kai Liew, Sabarinath Vinod Nair, Jasmine Chiat Ling Ong, Irene Li, Douglas Teodoro, Chuan Hong, Daniel Shu Wei Ting, Nan Liu

TL;DR
This paper compares traditional NLP and generative large language models in medicine, highlighting their respective strengths and emphasizing the importance of ethical considerations as these technologies evolve.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of 19,123 studies, revealing the distinct roles of LLMs and traditional NLP in various medical tasks and discussing ethical implications.
Findings
LLMs excel in open-ended medical tasks
Traditional NLP is more effective for information extraction
Ethical use is crucial for medical AI applications
Abstract
Natural language processing (NLP) has been traditionally applied to medicine, and generative large language models (LLMs) have become prominent recently. However, the differences between them across different medical tasks remain underexplored. We analyzed 19,123 studies, finding that generative LLMs demonstrate advantages in open-ended tasks, while traditional NLP dominates in information extraction and analysis tasks. As these technologies advance, ethical use of them is essential to ensure their potential in medical applications.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Machine Learning in Healthcare · Topic Modeling
