Non-Clifford Cost of Random Unitaries
Lorenzo Leone, Salvatore F.E. Oliviero, Alioscia Hamma, Jens Eisert, Lennart Bittel

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the non-Clifford resource cost in random quantum circuits, establishing bounds on how many non-Clifford gates are needed for various levels of unitary design approximation, highlighting the high cost of generating pseudo-random unitaries.
Contribution
It provides rigorous bounds on the non-Clifford resources required for random circuit ensembles to approximate unitary designs, refining understanding of their complexity and classical intractability.
Findings
Quadratic doping level $t = ilde{\Theta}(k^2)$ suffices for unitary $k$-designs.
Linear doping $t = ilde{\Theta}(nk)$ is necessary for relative-error $k$-designs.
Generating pseudo-random unitaries requires doping $t = \tilde{\Theta}(n)$.
Abstract
Recent years have enjoyed a strong interest in exploring properties and applications of random quantum circuits. In this work, we explore the ensemble of -doped Clifford circuits on qubits, consisting of Clifford circuits interspersed with single-qubit non-Clifford gates. We establish rigorous convergence bounds towards unitary -designs, revealing the intrinsic cost in terms of non-Clifford resources in various flavors. First, we analyze the -th order frame potential, which quantifies how well the ensemble of doped Clifford circuits is spread within the unitary group. We prove that a quadratic doping level, , is both necessary and sufficient to approximate the frame potential of the full unitary group. As a consequence, we refine existing upper bounds on the convergence of the ensemble towards state -designs. Second, we derive tight bounds on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
