Improved Rank Aggregation under Fairness Constraint
Diptarka Chakraborty, Himika Das, Sanjana Dey, Alvin Hong Yao Yan

TL;DR
This paper introduces improved algorithms for fair rank aggregation under the Kendall tau metric, achieving better approximation ratios than previous methods and demonstrating effectiveness through extensive experiments.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel $(2+psilon)$-approximation algorithm and a $2.881$-approximation algorithm for fair rank aggregation, surpassing existing 3-approximation bounds.
Findings
The $(2+psilon)$-approximation significantly improves over the previous 3-approximation.
The $2.881$-approximation algorithm is effective across various fairness notions.
Experimental results confirm the practical efficiency of the proposed algorithms.
Abstract
Aggregating multiple input rankings into a consensus ranking is essential in various fields such as social choice theory, hiring, college admissions, web search, and databases. A major challenge is that the optimal consensus ranking might be biased against individual candidates or groups, especially those from marginalized communities. This concern has led to recent studies focusing on fairness in rank aggregation. The goal is to ensure that candidates from different groups are fairly represented in the top- positions of the aggregated ranking. We study this fair rank aggregation problem by considering the Kendall tau as the underlying metric. While we know of a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for the classical rank aggregation problem, the corresponding fair variant only possesses a quite straightforward 3-approximation algorithm due to Wei et al., SIGMOD'22, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Multi-Criteria Decision Making
