Unsupervised Radar Point Cloud Enhancement via Arbitrary LiDAR Guided Diffusion Prior
Yanlong Yang, Jianan Liu, Guanxiong Luo, Hao Li, Euijoon Ahn, Mostafa Rahimi Azghadi, Tao Huang

TL;DR
This paper introduces an unsupervised method for enhancing radar point clouds using an arbitrary LiDAR-guided diffusion prior, eliminating the need for paired training data and improving generalization in radar perception tasks.
Contribution
It presents the first approach that leverages a diffusion model with LiDAR domain knowledge for radar point cloud enhancement without paired data.
Findings
Achieves high fidelity and low noise radar point clouds.
Performs comparably or better than supervised methods.
Demonstrates improved generalization over traditional techniques.
Abstract
In industrial automation, radar is a critical sensor in machine perception. However, the angular resolution of radar is inherently limited by the Rayleigh criterion, which depends on both the radar's operating wavelength and the effective aperture of its antenna array.To overcome these hardware-imposed limitations, recent neural network-based methods have leveraged high-resolution LiDAR data, paired with radar measurements, during training to enhance radar point cloud resolution. While effective, these approaches require extensive paired datasets, which are costly to acquire and prone to calibration error. These challenges motivate the need for methods that can improve radar resolution without relying on paired high-resolution ground-truth data. Here, we introduce an unsupervised radar points enhancement algorithm that employs an arbitrary LiDAR-guided diffusion model as a prior without…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
1. Unsupervised Formulation: The use of an unsupervised method to improve point cloud reconstruction quality is clearly a promising research direction. I believe this approach is particularly valuable for rare and special scenarios where it is often difficult to find LiDAR point cloud data with a matching distribution for paired training. 2. Generalization Ability: As a direct benefit of its unsupervised nature, the proposed method demonstrates strong generalization capabilities when tested on
My specific concerns are as follows: 1. **Poor In-domain Performance:** The method's in-domain results are underwhelming. **Table 2** indicates that the proposed approach offers only a marginal improvement over the traditional CFAR baseline, particularly on the commonly used CD and UCD metrics. More critically, the qualitative results in **Figure 4** show that CFAR can produce significantly more accurate reconstructions in some scenes (e.g., the third row), whereas the proposed method introduce
The paper is overall concise and application-oriented, with a clear presentation of problem statement, motivations, methodology, and experiments. The following lists some key contributions based on my understanding: 1. **Parallel Radar Forward Model**: Motivated by the limitations of the discrete process, the authors introduce a parallel radar forward model in Section 3.2 to apply the Fourier Filter Transformation on BEV grids for continualizations. 2. **Consistency Model**: Authors apply the di
For this application-oriented paper, limitations of the proposed model are evident in terms of its limited novelty and performance: 1. **Limited Novelty.** To the best of my knowledge, neither the concept of formulating Radar enhancement as a Bayesian inverse problem nor the application of combining Diffusion models in bridging LiDAR and radar is a novel idea compared to existing works. Based on this standpoint, the work is considered an incremental contribution to the field, as it replaces prio
1. The reviewer believe authors' motivation is strong – unsupervised radar enhancement is indeed essential becuase paired radar–LiDAR data is scarce and fragile. 2. Novel formulation regarding basyesion inverse problem and unsuperived learning with diffusion for radar enhanment. 3. Authors provide their code and showing that their performance outperfomnce CFAR in the cross dataset experiment, which is widely use in almost all radar systems.
1. The paper relies on several strong modeling assumptions—particularly the use of Gaussian noise and an idealized, linear radar sensing model and some are not clearly stated or justified. These assumptions may not accurately reflect the statistical or physical characteristics of real radar signals. In the reviewer’s opinion, assuming Gaussian noise before the FFT stage is reasonable and common practice, as it represents thermal receiver noise. However, for radar tensors from datasets such as RA
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies · Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques
