Explainability Through Human-Centric Design for XAI in Lung Cancer Detection
Amy Rafferty, Rishi Ramaesh, Ajitha Rajan

TL;DR
This paper introduces XpertXAI, a human-centric, expert-guided model for interpretable lung cancer detection from chest X-rays, outperforming existing explainability methods in clinical relevance and accuracy.
Contribution
The work extends prior concept bottleneck models to a scalable, multi-pathology framework that provides clinically meaningful explanations aligned with radiologist reasoning.
Findings
XpertXAI outperforms baseline methods in predictive accuracy.
It provides concept-level explanations consistent with expert annotations.
Existing explainability techniques often fail to produce meaningful clinical explanations.
Abstract
Deep learning models have shown promise in lung pathology detection from chest X-rays, but widespread clinical adoption remains limited due to opaque model decision-making. In prior work, we introduced ClinicXAI, a human-centric, expert-guided concept bottleneck model (CBM) designed for interpretable lung cancer diagnosis. We now extend that approach and present XpertXAI, a generalizable expert-driven model that preserves human-interpretable clinical concepts while scaling to detect multiple lung pathologies. Using a high-performing InceptionV3-based classifier and a public dataset of chest X-rays with radiology reports, we compare XpertXAI against leading post-hoc explainability methods and an unsupervised CBM, XCBs. We assess explanations through comparison with expert radiologist annotations and medical ground truth. Although XpertXAI is trained for multiple pathologies, our expert…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
