Rapidity and multiplicity dependence of charged-particle flow in $p$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 8.16$ TeV
R. Aaij, A.S.W. Abdelmotteleb, C. Abellan Beteta, F. Abudin\'en, T. Ackernley, A. A. Adefisoye, B. Adeva, M. Adinolfi, P. Adlarson, C. Agapopoulou, C.A. Aidala, Z. Ajaltouni, S. Akar, K. Akiba, P. Albicocco, J. Albrecht, F. Alessio, Z. Aliouche, P. Alvarez Cartelle, R. Amalric

TL;DR
This study measures elliptic and triangular flow of charged particles in proton-lead collisions at 8.16 TeV, analyzing how flow varies with multiplicity and transverse momentum, and compares results with theoretical models.
Contribution
It provides detailed flow measurements in pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV and evaluates the performance of a (3+1)D dynamic model against experimental data.
Findings
The (3+1)D model overestimates elliptic flow.
No significant difference in flow between forward and backward regions.
Flow effects likely dominate over initial-state effects in small systems.
Abstract
The elliptic and triangular flow of charged particles are measured using two-particle angular correlations in Pb collisions in the pseudorapidity range \cal{2.0 4.8}. The data sample was collected by the LHCb experiment in 2016 at a centre-of-mass energy per nucleon pair of TeV, containing in total approximately 1.5 billion collision events. Non-flow contributions are obtained in low-multiplicity collisions and subtracted to extract the flow harmonics. The results are presented as a function of event multiplicity and hadron transverse momentum. Comparisons with a full (3+1)D dynamic model indicate that it overestimates the measured elliptic flow. A comparison between the forward and backward regions reveals no significant differences in flow parameters, suggesting that final-state effects may dominate over initial-state effects in the origin of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
