Post-Quantum Cryptography: An Analysis of Code-Based and Lattice-Based Cryptosystems
Alexander Meyer

TL;DR
This paper analyzes code-based and lattice-based cryptosystems as promising quantum-resistant alternatives, focusing on McEliece and NTRU, and explores their security foundations against quantum attacks.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of McEliece and NTRU cryptosystems, highlighting their structural security assumptions and potential as post-quantum cryptographic solutions.
Findings
McEliece is believed to be secure against quantum attacks due to code hardness.
NTRU's security relies on the difficulty of the Shortest Vector Problem.
Connections between the structural foundations of both systems are established.
Abstract
Most modern cryptographic systems, such as RSA and the Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange, rely on "trapdoor" mathematical functions that are presumed to be computationally difficult with existing tools. However, quantum computers will be able to break these systems using Shor's Algorithm, necessitating the development of quantum-resistant alternatives. We first examine the McEliece cryptosystem, a code-based scheme believed to be secure against quantum attacks due to the hardness of decoding arbitrary linear codes. We then explore NTRU, a lattice-based system grounded in the difficulty of solving the Shortest Vector Problem. Finally, we establish connections between the structural foundations and security of the two systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption · Cellular Automata and Applications
