Modelling the impact of quasar redshift errors on the full-shape analysis of correlations in the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest
Calum Gordon, Andrei Cuceu, Andreu Font-Ribera, Hiram K. Herrera-Alcantar, Jessica Nicole Aguilar, Steven Ahlen, Davide Bianchi, David Brooks, Todd Claybaugh, Shaun Cole, Axel de la Macorra, Biprateep Dey, Peter Doel, Jaime E. Forero-Romero, Enrique Gazta\~naga

TL;DR
This paper models how quasar redshift errors affect the full-shape analysis of the Lyman-alpha forest correlations, proposing methods to mitigate biases in cosmological parameter estimation for DESI data.
Contribution
It introduces a combined model for quasar redshift error contamination in both auto- and cross-correlations, enabling bias removal in full-shape analyses.
Findings
Redshift errors cause small impact on BAO measurements.
A joint model with 3 parameters effectively removes bias.
A practical removal strategy involves discarding 0.3% of pairs.
Abstract
In preparation for the first cosmological measurements from the full-shape of the Lyman- (Ly) forest from DESI, we must carefully model all relevant systematics that might bias our analysis. It was shown in Youles et al. (2022) that random quasar redshift errors produce a smoothing effect on the mean quasar continuum in the Ly forest region. This in turn gives rise to spurious features in the Ly auto-correlation, and its cross-correlation with quasars. Using synthetic data sets based on the DESI survey, we confirm that the impact on BAO measurements is small, but that a bias is introduced to parameters which depend on the full-shape of our correlations. We combine a model of this contamination in the cross-correlation (Youles et al. 2022) with a new model we introduce here for the auto-correlation. These are parametrised by 3 parameters, which when…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
