PCS-UQ: Uncertainty Quantification via the Predictability-Computability-Stability Framework
Abhineet Agarwal, Michael Xiao, Rebecca Barter, Omer Ronen, Boyu Fan, and Bin Yu

TL;DR
PCS-UQ introduces a robust uncertainty quantification method based on the PCS framework, improving coverage reliability and reducing prediction interval sizes in high-stakes machine learning applications.
Contribution
It develops a novel PCS-UQ approach that addresses model selection, stability, and calibration, outperforming conformal methods in coverage and efficiency across diverse datasets.
Findings
Achieves desired coverage with approximately 20% narrower intervals.
Maintains target coverage across subgroups where conformal methods fail.
Reduces prediction set size by 20% in computer vision benchmarks.
Abstract
As machine learning (ML) models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, trustworthy uncertainty quantification (UQ) is critical for ensuring the safety and reliability of these models. Traditional UQ methods rely on specifying a true generative model and are not robust to misspecification. On the other hand, conformal inference allows for arbitrary ML models but does not consider model selection, which leads to large interval sizes. We tackle these drawbacks by proposing a UQ method based on the predictability, computability, and stability (PCS) framework for veridical data science proposed by Yu and Kumbier. Specifically, PCS-UQ addresses model selection by using a prediction check to screen out unsuitable models. PCS-UQ then fits these screened algorithms across multiple bootstraps to assess inter-sample variability and algorithmic instability, enabling more reliable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
