Which Covariates to Adjust for? Specification-robust Causal Inference in Observational Studies
Aditya Ghosh, Dominik Rothenh\"ausler

TL;DR
This paper introduces a robust method for causal inference in observational studies that provides valid estimates even when multiple covariate adjustment sets are plausible, by reweighting the population to ensure credible inference.
Contribution
It proposes a specification-robust procedure that yields a single point estimate and confidence interval valid under at least one correct adjustment set, addressing conflicts among different covariate adjustments.
Findings
Provides tighter confidence intervals than existing methods
Maintains nominal coverage across various adjustment sets
Demonstrates effectiveness on synthetic and real data
Abstract
In observational causal inference, domain knowledge often leaves multiple covariate adjustments plausible, yet which sets satisfy ignorability is untestable. Different adjustment sets can yield conflicting estimates of the average treatment effect, and standard remedies (adjusting for their union or intersection, or reporting the union or convex hull of confidence intervals) can fail or produce intervals whose width does not vanish with sample size. We propose a specification-robust procedure that returns a single point estimate and a confidence interval that is valid as long as at least one candidate adjustment set is valid and has width shrinking at the parametric rate. Our approach mirrors how trimming and overlap weighting handle overlap violations:~We shift the target to a reweighted population, closest in KL-divergence to the original population, for which credible,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
