Comparison of laser system designs for quantum technologies: BECCAL flight system vs. BECCAL ground test bed
Victoria A. Henderson, Jean-Pierre Marburger, Andr\'e Wenzlawski, Tim Kroh, Hamish Beck, Marc Kitzmann, Ahmad Bawamia, Marvin Warner, Mareen L. Czech, Matthias Schoch, Jakob Pohl, Matthias Dammasch, Christian K\"urbis, Ortwin Hellmig, Christoph Grzeschik, Evgeny V. Kovalchuk

TL;DR
This paper compares two laser system designs for the BECCAL quantum experiment payload on the ISS, highlighting their differences in size, weight, environmental robustness, and suitability for space versus ground testing.
Contribution
It introduces a custom, space-optimized laser system and compares it with a commercial off-the-shelf model for quantum experiments in space.
Findings
Both systems meet BECCAL requirements
The flight model is more compact and robust
The COTS system is suitable for laboratory testing
Abstract
We present the design of laser systems for the Bose-Einstein Condensate and Cold Atom Laboratory (BECCAL) payload, enabling numerous quantum technological experiments onboard the International Space Station (ISS), in particular dual species 87Rb and 41K Bose-Einstein condensates. A flight model (FM) and a commercial off the shelf (COTS) based model are shown, both of which meet the BECCAL requirements in terms of functionality, but have differing size, weight and power (SWaP) and environmental requirements. The capabilities of both models are discussed and characteristics compared. The flight model of BECCAL uses specifically developed and qualified custom components to create a compact and robust system suitable for long-term remote operation onboard the ISS. This system is based on ECDL-MOPA lasers and free-space optical benches made of Zerodur, as well as commercial fibre components.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
