Improved ion bunch quality of conical target irradiated by ultra-intense and ultra-short laser
Wan-Qing Su, Xi-Guang Cao, Chun-Wang Ma, Guo-Qiang Zhang, Hui-Ling Wei, Yu-Ting Wang, Chun-Yuan Qiao, Jie Pu, Kai-Xuan Cheng, Ya-Fei Guo

TL;DR
This study uses particle-in-cell simulations to optimize laser-target configurations, significantly improving the quality and energy of ion beams generated by ultra-intense lasers, with potential applications in synthesizing superheavy nuclei.
Contribution
It demonstrates how conical targets with specific angularity and polarization control can enhance ion beam quality and energy in laser-driven ion acceleration.
Findings
Linearly polarized lasers outperform circularly polarized lasers in beam quality.
Conical targets with left angularity and intermediate thickness yield higher ion energies.
Optimized configurations enable potential synthesis of superheavy nuclei.
Abstract
We conduct particle-in-cell simulations to estimate the effects of circularly and linearly polarized SEL 100 PW lasers on flat Th targets with thicknesses of 50 nm, 100 nm and 250 nm, as well as easy to manufacture conical Th targets with angularity either on the left or right. As the thickness of the three types of targets increases and under the same polarized laser, the average energy, maximum energy and energy conversion efficiency of Th ions decrease as it is well-known, and except for the circularly polarized laser hit on the conical target with angularity on the left, the Th ion beam emittance also decreases, while its beam intensity increases conversely. The linearly polarized laser, compared to the circularly polarized laser with the same laser intensity, exhibits higher beam intensity, beam emittance and energy conversion efficiency for the same type and thickness of Th…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
