TL;DR
This paper introduces WM3C, a novel reinforcement learning framework that uses language-guided compositional causal components to improve generalization to unseen environments by disentangling dynamics and leveraging causal reasoning.
Contribution
WM3C is the first approach to incorporate language-guided compositional causal components for enhanced RL generalization and provides theoretical guarantees for component identification.
Findings
WM3C outperforms existing methods in identifying latent processes.
It improves policy learning and generalization to unseen tasks.
Demonstrated effectiveness on simulations and robotic manipulation.
Abstract
Generalization in reinforcement learning (RL) remains a significant challenge, especially when agents encounter novel environments with unseen dynamics. Drawing inspiration from human compositional reasoning -- where known components are reconfigured to handle new situations -- we introduce World Modeling with Compositional Causal Components (WM3C). This novel framework enhances RL generalization by learning and leveraging compositional causal components. Unlike previous approaches focusing on invariant representation learning or meta-learning, WM3C identifies and utilizes causal dynamics among composable elements, facilitating robust adaptation to new tasks. Our approach integrates language as a compositional modality to decompose the latent space into meaningful components and provides theoretical guarantees for their unique identification under mild assumptions. Our practical…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
Good analytical experiments, some improvements in sample complexity on metaworld.
Method adds substantial complexity and also seems to require much more domain knowledge than the baseline.
1. An exciting and important problem is being tackled. 2. Comprehensive conceptual and theoretical analysis.
My main concern is a relatively lean experimental section; see the questions and points below. 1. As the proposed method is quite complicated, it is unclear if the effects can be due to the described mechanisms. 2. Only one real-world environment is tested (I am aware that it might be partially due to a lack of proper benchmarks). 3. Only one algorithm is tested. 4. The transfer and generalization results are relatively weak (at the same time, I am not quite sure if the current scale of exper
- The identification result in Theorem 1 is interesting and implies an advantage of language-driven RL agents compared to non-language counterparts. - Empirical results are generally good. I also like the intervention results in Figure 6.
I think the biggest weakness of the paper in its current form is the discrepancy between the motivation, theoretical results, and the algorithm. - The authors motivate their algorithm by the need to identify composition causal components in the underlying data generation model, which possesses some ideal traits like modularity and sparsity, as introduced in the causal learning literature. However, if our aim is to identify "causal" components, then we need to recover not only those components bu
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
