Training Strategies for Efficient Embodied Reasoning
William Chen, Suneel Belkhale, Suvir Mirchandani, Oier Mees, Danny Driess, Karl Pertsch, Sergey Levine

TL;DR
This paper investigates why robot chain-of-thought reasoning improves policy performance, identifies key mechanisms, and proposes lightweight alternatives that enhance efficiency and accuracy in vision-language-action models.
Contribution
It provides a mechanistic understanding of robot reasoning benefits and introduces simple, efficient reasoning strategies that outperform existing methods.
Findings
Reasoning improves representation learning and action prediction.
Attending to generated reasonings enhances policy performance.
Proposed methods achieve state-of-the-art results and faster inference.
Abstract
Robot chain-of-thought reasoning (CoT) -- wherein a model predicts helpful intermediate representations before choosing actions -- provides an effective method for improving the generalization and performance of robot policies, especially vision-language-action models (VLAs). While such approaches have been shown to improve performance and generalization, they suffer from core limitations, like needing specialized robot reasoning data and slow inference speeds. To design new robot reasoning approaches that address these issues, a more complete characterization of why reasoning helps policy performance is critical. We hypothesize several mechanisms by which robot reasoning improves policies -- (1) better representation learning, (2) improved learning curricularization, and (3) increased expressivity -- then devise simple variants of robot CoT reasoning to isolate and test each one. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
