TL;DR
This paper introduces a robust treatment fusion method for policy learning in settings with many treatments, addressing data sparsity and imbalance, and enabling effective individualized treatment recommendations.
Contribution
It proposes a novel calibration-weighted treatment fusion procedure that balances covariates and fuses treatments, with theoretical guarantees and practical advantages over existing methods.
Findings
Superior group recovery in simulations
Improved policy value compared to existing methods
Effective application to real-world health data
Abstract
Individualized treatment rules/recommendations (ITRs) aim to improve patient outcomes by tailoring treatments to the characteristics of each individual. However, when there are many treatment groups, existing methods face significant challenges due to data sparsity within treatment groups and highly unbalanced covariate distributions across groups. To address these challenges, we propose a novel calibration-weighted treatment fusion procedure that robustly balances covariates across treatment groups and fuses similar treatments using a penalized working model. The fusion procedure ensures the recovery of latent treatment group structures when either the calibration model or the outcome model is correctly specified. In the fused treatment space, practitioners can seamlessly apply state-of-the-art ITR learning methods with the flexibility to utilize a subset of covariates, thereby…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
